Mitigating reduced flood peaks, magnitudes, and frequency
Contents
Introduction
The river regulations often change the natural flow regime and the sediment connectivity, by this introducing changes to the substrate composition both in the bypass section and downstream the outlet of the hydropower plant. In particular, the reduction in magnitude, frequency and duration of floods impact the substrate composition, typically leading to fine materials clogging the substrate and possibly creating an armoured layer. An armoured layer will inhibit the spawning of fish species laying their eggs in the substrate, potentially reducing the number of eggs deposited in the substrate, increasing the predation and possibly also reducing the survival of eggs, e.g. due to low oxygen levels in the hyporheic zone. As such, the areas supporting spawning can be reduced due to regulation and hence represent a limiting factor ('bottleneck') for the fish population.
The grain size of distribution of the spawning gravel to be placed in the river must be such it supports the species of concern. It must not consist of substrate the spawning fish is able to dig and lay their egg in, and not so fine that clogging will occur. The shape of the stones should as the natural conditions in the river, and sharp-edged stones from blasting, often available close to a hydropower project, should only be used if considered appropriate for the species of concern. If the gravel is not sufficient 'clean', it should be washed prior to deposited in the river, in order to avoid particle pollution and possibly increased clogging downstream.
Before placement of spawning gravel in the river is made, the hydraulic conditions where the spawning gravel is placed must be investigated. The gravel must be located in a part of the river that does not dry out during low flow conditions, in areas with sufficient through-flow of fresh, oxygen-rich water to the eggs, and in areas that are not exposed to out-wash/flushing during high flow events.
This measure has been implemented in a number of rivers in Norway. It is a fairly cheap measure to introduce, it stimulates the natural population and seems to achieve very good results in all rivers it has been used.
Methods, tools, and devices
During planning
A first step in considering placement of spawning gravel as a measure would be to assess if the total and distribution of spawning areas are limiting the development of fish population, i.e. diagnosis in the environmental design terminology. The spawning areas are often assessed by visual inspection of the river, i.e. by foot beside the river, by wading or from boat. Aerial photos can also in some cases assist this step. When the spawning areas are identified, they can be mapped in a GIS and the total area and their distribution assessed. For Atlantic salmon, spawning areas are considered being large if more than 10% of the total river has suitable spawning conditions, moderate if between 1-10% and small if less than 1% (Forseth & Harby, 2013). The distribution/spread is considered large if more than 500 meters between identified spawning areas, medium if between 200-500 meters, and small if less than 200 meters. These threshold values are considered indicative for Atlantic salmon, and will be different for other fish species.
|
Extent of spawning habitat as a percentage of river area |
||||
|
Small (<1%) |
Moderate (1-10%) | Large (>10%) | ||
| Distance between spawning habitats (across all segments) |
Large (>500m) |
Small | Small | Moderate |
| Medium (200-500m) | Small | Moderate |
Large |
|
| Small (<200m) | Moderate | Large |
Large |
|
Hydraulic analysis can support the identification of the best location to place the spawning gravel, in order to meet the preferences of the fish of concern, avoid locations with too slow-flowing water and areas exposed to flushing during high flow conditions. A high number of hydro-dynamic tools are available for such analysis with different functionality and data needs, ranging from more simplistic 1-dimensional (1D) hydraulic tools, to highly advanced 3-dimensional (3D) tools solving a range of partial differential equations (Navier-Stokes) in all directions. The all require details description of the bottom topography of the areas the gravel might be placed, and a flow regime the river will undergo. As average flow velocities will not be sufficiently detailed to identify the best locations, 2D- or 3D models will be required. Examples of such models are River2D, HEC-RAS 2D, Flow2D/3D, Mike21 and OpenFoam.
During implementation
The implementation of the measure would require access to substrate of suitable grain size distribution, shape and of proper mineral composition, preferably similar to the substrate naturally present in spawning areas. In order to transport and place the new material at the right locations in the river, heavy machinery such as dumpers and tractors would be needed. In case where the site is difficult to access, use of helicopters can be the best option. The dumping of the substrate in the river would normally require supervision of a biologist, hydraulician or another experienced person in order to secure the right positioning of the substrate, proper thickness of substrate layer and finish of the surface preparation.
The construction work will often require use of heavy machinery. Depending on the location of the river and how accessible it is and the costs, the transport of gravel will typically be made by dumper or by helicopter. If helicopter is used, the gravel can normally be dumped directly into the river, under the supervision of a biologist or another experienced person. If the new material is transported into the site by dumpers, an excavator will normally be needed at the site. This will also require the presence of an experienced person in order to ensure the correct placement and thickness of the gravel.
The implementation of the measures, i.e. dumping of the gravel, should be made in a time of the year where the fish population of the concern, and the rest of the ecosystem in the river will be least affected by the construction work. This will be individual to the different rivers and species. In addition, the hydrology of the river must be taken into consideration as it is clearly easier to carry out the work during low-flow conditions than during floods. For Scandinavia and species like salmon and trout, the period from July to September is probably the least problematic.
During operation
Habitat measures in regulated rivers must often be maintained unless the natural functions related to flow and sediments are restored, such as flood events and connectivity of the sediments. How often the maintenance must be made will differ from river to river and can vary from for instance every 5 years to every 20 years. Rivers with intense growth of moss, algae and macrophytes would need more frequent maintenance than rivers with cold water and low nutrient concentrations (less growth).
Classification Table
|
Assessment criteria |
Assessment |
|
Fish species measure designed for |
Atlantic salmon (salmo salar) Trout (salmo trutta) |
|
Which life-stage of fish is measure aimed at? |
Spawning |
|
Which physical parameter mitigated? |
Substrate |
|
Section in the regulated system measure designed for |
Bypass section Upstream of hydropower plant Downstream outlet |
|
River type implemented in |
Gravel-bed rivers |
|
Climatic region suitable for |
C: Temperate (mesothermal) climates D: Continental (microthermal) climates E: Polar and alpine (montane) climates |
|
Level of certainty in effect |
Very certain |
|
Technology readiness level (maturity) |
TRL9: actual system proven in operational environment (competitive manufacturing in the case of key enabling technologies; or in space) |
