Difference between revisions of "Hydropeaking indicator"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Quick summary= | =Quick summary= | ||
| − | [[file:hydropeaking_indicator_ex1.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Example of flow analysis (1 | + | [[file:hydropeaking_indicator_ex1.png|thumb|250px|Figure 1: Example of flow analysis (source: [1].]] |
| − | [[file:hydropeaking_indicator_ex2.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Example of flow analysis (2 | + | [[file:hydropeaking_indicator_ex2.png|thumb|250px|Figure 2: Example of flow analysis (source: [2].]] |
[[file:hydropeaking_indicator_levels.png|thumb|250px|Figure 3: Levels of hydrologic perturbation due to hydropeaking events.]] | [[file:hydropeaking_indicator_levels.png|thumb|250px|Figure 3: Levels of hydrologic perturbation due to hydropeaking events.]] | ||
[[file:hydropeaking_indicator_evolution.png|thumb|250px|Figure 4: Evolution of the Hydropeaking indicator on the Maronne river at Basteyroux station for the whole year and during the spring (mid-march to mid-june); effect of the progressive implementation of mitigation measures since 2001.]] | [[file:hydropeaking_indicator_evolution.png|thumb|250px|Figure 4: Evolution of the Hydropeaking indicator on the Maronne river at Basteyroux station for the whole year and during the spring (mid-march to mid-june); effect of the progressive implementation of mitigation measures since 2001.]] | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=Introduction= | =Introduction= | ||
| − | Hydropeaking at hydroelectric facilities (more than 150 in France) generates sudden changes in flow in the river and can affect the composition, the abundance and the structure of fish and invertebrates populations over long distances. The objectives of the | + | Hydropeaking at hydroelectric facilities (more than 150 in France) generates sudden changes in flow in the river and can affect the composition, the abundance and the structure of fish and invertebrates populations over long distances. The objectives of the ''Hydropeaking Indicator'' tool are [1] to characterize peaks within hydrograph and [2] to produce a synthetic indicator of hydrological disturbance, related to the impacts on fish populations. |
| − | From the analysis of 97 stations and 1575 years of flow data, rates of change of natural flow variations have been | + | From the analysis of 97 stations and 1575 years of flow data, rates of change of natural flow variations have been firstly characterized (Figures 1 and 2) in 8 ranges between 5% and 4 times the mean inter-annual discharge. Formulas representing the ''fastest variations possible naturally'' and taking into account the type of change (increase or decrease), the size of the stream (via the mean inter-annual discharge) and the flow range over which the variation takes place have been constructed and then used to discriminate hydropeaks and natural events. |
| − | From the analysis of 80 stations and 491 years of flow data affected by hydropeaking, a method was developed to identify, within the hydrograph, hydropeaks whose characteristics are beyond what can occur in natural hydrology, using | + | From the analysis of 80 stations and 491 years of flow data affected by hydropeaking, a method was developed to identify, within the hydrograph, hydropeaks whose characteristics are beyond what can occur in natural hydrology, using three criteria: a minimum range (≥ 10% of the mean inter-annual discharge and ≥ 20% of the hydropeak base flow), a minimal rate of change (> to the maximum natural rate of change) and an upper limit on the maximum flow rate (to remove flood events). |
| − | A synthetic indicator differentiating | + | A synthetic indicator differentiating five levels of hydrological disturbance induced by hydropeaking regimes was developed (Figure 3). The level of disturbance of each of the 491 years of flow data was evaluated by three expert operators, according to the knowledge of the biological impacts of hydropeaking. The linear discriminant analysis allows reproducing this classification using five characteristic parameters of hydropeaking regimes (87% of correct reclassification). |
=Application= | =Application= | ||
| − | The | + | The Hydropeaking Indicator needs discharge time series as input file, with a fixed or variable time step. This time step should be short to precisely describe the hydropeaks (< 0.5-1 h). The indicator can be produced per year or per period corresponding to biological phases / seasons. Its automated calculation requires knowing only the mean inter-annual flow of the river and the maximum turbine discharge of the hydropower plant upstream. |
| − | The | + | The Hydropeaking Indicator produces [1] a set of parameters that characterizes each hydropeak (base flow, maximum flow, rate of change…) and their statistics, and [2] the score provided by the discriminant analysis and the level of perturbation. |
Examples show that the indicator is sensitive to changes in hydropower plant management and allows appreciating the spatial and temporal changes in hydropeaking regimes, including the damping in the downstream direction (Figure 4). This indicator is a tool for managers of "pre-diagnosis" of biological impacts and for monitoring spatial and temporal changes in hydropeaking. | Examples show that the indicator is sensitive to changes in hydropower plant management and allows appreciating the spatial and temporal changes in hydropeaking regimes, including the damping in the downstream direction (Figure 4). This indicator is a tool for managers of "pre-diagnosis" of biological impacts and for monitoring spatial and temporal changes in hydropeaking. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
=Other information= | =Other information= | ||
| − | The Hydropeaking Indicator is implemented in an Excel sheet, using a macro coded in Visual Basic. The tool can be transmitted for free by the | + | The Hydropeaking Indicator is implemented in an Excel sheet, using a macro coded in Visual Basic. The tool can be transmitted for free by the Ecohydraulics Team AFB-IMFT after agreement. |
| − | At the French Test Cases an electromagnetic flow meter Marsh McBirney, FLO-MATE 2000 is used. | + | At the French Test Cases, an electromagnetic flow meter Marsh McBirney, FLO-MATE 2000 is used. |
=Relevant literature= | =Relevant literature= | ||
Revision as of 08:24, 12 April 2020
Contents
Quick summary
Developed by: French Agency For Biodiversity, Ecohydraulic Team AFB-IMFT, Courret D, Larinier M and Baran P.
Date: 2014
Type: Tool
Introduction
Hydropeaking at hydroelectric facilities (more than 150 in France) generates sudden changes in flow in the river and can affect the composition, the abundance and the structure of fish and invertebrates populations over long distances. The objectives of the Hydropeaking Indicator tool are [1] to characterize peaks within hydrograph and [2] to produce a synthetic indicator of hydrological disturbance, related to the impacts on fish populations.
From the analysis of 97 stations and 1575 years of flow data, rates of change of natural flow variations have been firstly characterized (Figures 1 and 2) in 8 ranges between 5% and 4 times the mean inter-annual discharge. Formulas representing the fastest variations possible naturally and taking into account the type of change (increase or decrease), the size of the stream (via the mean inter-annual discharge) and the flow range over which the variation takes place have been constructed and then used to discriminate hydropeaks and natural events.
From the analysis of 80 stations and 491 years of flow data affected by hydropeaking, a method was developed to identify, within the hydrograph, hydropeaks whose characteristics are beyond what can occur in natural hydrology, using three criteria: a minimum range (≥ 10% of the mean inter-annual discharge and ≥ 20% of the hydropeak base flow), a minimal rate of change (> to the maximum natural rate of change) and an upper limit on the maximum flow rate (to remove flood events).
A synthetic indicator differentiating five levels of hydrological disturbance induced by hydropeaking regimes was developed (Figure 3). The level of disturbance of each of the 491 years of flow data was evaluated by three expert operators, according to the knowledge of the biological impacts of hydropeaking. The linear discriminant analysis allows reproducing this classification using five characteristic parameters of hydropeaking regimes (87% of correct reclassification).
Application
The Hydropeaking Indicator needs discharge time series as input file, with a fixed or variable time step. This time step should be short to precisely describe the hydropeaks (< 0.5-1 h). The indicator can be produced per year or per period corresponding to biological phases / seasons. Its automated calculation requires knowing only the mean inter-annual flow of the river and the maximum turbine discharge of the hydropower plant upstream.
The Hydropeaking Indicator produces [1] a set of parameters that characterizes each hydropeak (base flow, maximum flow, rate of change…) and their statistics, and [2] the score provided by the discriminant analysis and the level of perturbation.
Examples show that the indicator is sensitive to changes in hydropower plant management and allows appreciating the spatial and temporal changes in hydropeaking regimes, including the damping in the downstream direction (Figure 4). This indicator is a tool for managers of "pre-diagnosis" of biological impacts and for monitoring spatial and temporal changes in hydropeaking.
Relevant mitigation measures and test cases
| Relevant measures | |
|---|---|
| Fish refuge under hydropeaking conditions | |
| Mitigating rapid, short-term variations in flow (hydro-peaking operations) | |
| Mitigating reduced annual flow and low flow measures | |
| Mitigating reduced flood peaks, magnitudes, and frequency | |
| Relevant test cases | Applied in test case? |
| Anundsjö test case | - |
| Bragado test case | Yes |
Other information
The Hydropeaking Indicator is implemented in an Excel sheet, using a macro coded in Visual Basic. The tool can be transmitted for free by the Ecohydraulics Team AFB-IMFT after agreement.
At the French Test Cases, an electromagnetic flow meter Marsh McBirney, FLO-MATE 2000 is used.
Relevant literature
- [1] Courret D, 2010. Etude des gradients des variations de débit naturelles en vue de la fixation des critères pour le repérage des éclusées hydroélectriques. Rapport GHAAPPE RA.09.04.
- [2] http://oai.eau-adour-garonne.fr/oai-documents/59478/GED_00000000.pdf
- [3] Courret D, Larinier M, Baran P, 2014. Développement d’une méthodologie de caractérisation des éclusées hydroélectriques et Définition d’un indicateur du niveau de la perturbation hydrologique *induite (seconde version). Rapport GHAAPPE RA.14.02.
- [4] Courret D., 2014. Caractérisation de la perturbation hydrologique induite par les régimes d'éclusées hydroélectriques et définition d'un indicateur - Réflexion sur les mesures de mitigation des impacts des éclusées sur les populations de poissons. Thèse de l'INP Toulouse.
- [5] http://ethesis.inp-toulouse.fr/archive/00002880/
