Difference between revisions of "Complete or partial migration barrier removal"

From FIThydrowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
=Classification table=
 
=Classification table=
{| class="wikitable"
+
{{Complete or partial migration barrier removal}}
! Classification !! Selection
 
|-
 
|Fish species for the measure||[[Fish species for the measure::All]]
 
|-
 
|rowspan = "3"|Does the measure require loss of power production||-
 
|-
 
||-
 
|-
 
||[[Does the measure require loss of power production::Structural (requires no additional flow release)]]
 
|-
 
||Recurrence of maintenance||[[Recurrence of maintenance::Irregular at events]]
 
|-
 
|rowspan = "6"|Which life-stage of fish is measure aimed at||-
 
|-
 
||-
 
|-
 
||-
 
|-
 
||-
 
|-
 
||-
 
|-
 
||[[Which life-stage of fish is measure aimed at::Movements of migration of fish]]
 
|-
 
|rowspan = "7"|Which physical parameter is mitigated||[[Which physical parameter is mitigated::Flow quantity]]
 
|-
 
||[[Which physical parameter is mitigated::Flow variations]]
 
|-
 
||[[Which physical parameter is mitigated::Substrate and hyporheic zone]]
 
|-
 
||[[Which physical parameter is mitigated::Water temperature]]
 
|-
 
||[[Which physical parameter is mitigated::Ice]]
 
|-
 
||[[Which physical parameter is mitigated::Water velocity]]
 
|-
 
||[[Which physical parameter is mitigated::Water depth]]
 
|-
 
|rowspan = "2"|Hydropower type the measure is suitable for||[[Hydropower type the measure is suitable for::Plant in dam]]
 
|-
 
||[[Hydropower type the measure is suitable for::Plant with bypass section]]
 
|-
 
||Dam height (m) the measure is suitable for||[[Dam height (m) the measure is suitable for::Up to 20]]
 
|-
 
|rowspan = "3"|Section in the regulated system measure is designed for||-
 
|-
 
||[[Section in the regulated system measure is designed for::Bypass section]]
 
|-
 
||-
 
|-
 
|rowspan = "3"|River type implemented||[[River type implemented::Steep gradient (up to 0.4 %)]]
 
|-
 
||[[River type implemented::Fairly steep with rocks, boulders (from 0.4 to 0.05 %)]]
 
|-
 
||[[River type implemented::Slow flowing, lowland, sandy (less than 0.05 %)]]
 
|-
 
||Level of certainty in effect||[[Level of certainty in effect::Moderately certain]]
 
|-
 
||Technology readiness level||[[Technology readiness level::TRL 9: actual system proven in operational environment]]
 
|}
 
 
 
 
[[category:Upstream fish migration measures]][[category:Measures]]
 
[[category:Upstream fish migration measures]][[category:Measures]]

Revision as of 10:30, 28 October 2019

Introduction

Figure 1: Removal of concrete weir in Norway by use of explosives and excavator.

If connectivity is to be restored, it should initially be considered whether the migration barrier can be removed. It is often the best and most long-term solution if the goal is to recreate connectivity. Here, the solution focuses on rivers regulated for hydropower production where dams will basically be maintained, but also in other regulated rivers there are possibilities for removing obstacles. Only in the Alpine region of Europe, a large number of dams have been built for river bed stabilization, and many of these have been replaced by block ramps, complete or partial removed. In addition, smaller weirs have been removed in residual flow reaches or minimum flow reaches with great success (Fjeldstad et al. 2012).

Methods, tools, and devices

During planning

Planning of fish barrier removal will start with mapping and surveying of the barrier itself and the river reach upstream and downstream of the barrier. This includes measurements of water covered area, water edges and river slope and the bathymetry of the area. Geographic data should be handled in GIS software for further planning and analyses. The construction planning should be supported with simple hydraulic modelling or calculations, such as the models River2D, HEC-RAS 2D, OpenFoam or Telemac 2D and 3D (see Chapter 9.1 for references). The physical adjustments should then be planned according to the hydraulic calculations, assuring a stable bottom substrate and hydraulic conditions suitable for fish migrations.

During implementation

Physical implementation of migration barrier removals requires heavy machinery suited for the river size and its surrounding terrain, such as excavators and lorries. It must be considered how the different parts of the barrier, such as rocks and boulders, can be used as elements in the new habitat. Under normal conditions, none or only small volumes of substrate need to be transported to or from the construction site. Here, it is crucial that the labor involved has the relevant experience to make the best decisions while adjusting the physical habitat and that they have the required understanding of the planning documents and purpose of the measures

During operation

Physical habitat measures in regulated rivers must often be maintained to ensure that functions related to flow and sediments are restored, such as flood events and connectivity of the sediments. The frequency of the maintenance will be very site-specific.

Classification table

Classification Selection
Fish species for the measure Gravel spawners
Does the measure require loss of power production -
-
Structural (requires no additional flow release)
Recurrence of maintenance Irregular at events
Which life-stage of fish is measure aimed at -
-
-
Movements of migration of fish
Which physical parameter is addressed N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hydropower type the measure is suitable for Plant in dam
Plant with bypass section
Dam height (m) the measure is suitable for Up to 20
Section in the regulated system measure is designed for In dam/power plant
-
-
-
River type implemented Steep gradient (up to 0.4 %)
Fairly steep with rocks, boulders (from 0.4 to 0.05 %)
Slow flowing, lowland, sandy (less than 0.05 %)
Level of certainty in effect Moderately certain
Technology readiness level TRL 9: actual system proven in operational environment
Cost of solution See cost table